We arm wrestled and 4 girls were the winners in our class. Although the 4 final winners were chosen, they all reached this position by fighting different opponents with different advantages such as teaming up with other people. Therefore, these people wouldn't necessarily be the strongest in the classroom. In addition, the winners invited one classmate each to participate in their group, without any requirements. Others were able to participate because they were the richest, or had the most family members. Even if other classmates felt it was unfair the four winners have the right to use the veto, rejecting all changes. This is exactly the system of the united nations security council. The inequity of the system is so obvious, yet there is nothing we can do.
In our groups, we discussed what we would do if the 4 winners were to be the dominant country and rule others. As a solution our government talked about creating a new UN without the 4 winners, which unfortunately did not turn out to be an ideal plan, since two of the winners were spying on us. Someone said that there would definitely be a war between the powerful countries and the ones that are not. Nevertheless, there would be conflicts inside of each country, due to opposing views. The active learning we did today, allowed a better understanding of the UNSC structure, and the severity.
notes:
bilateral treaty
cant call the police in a country
the league of nations- the forerunner to the US
The League of Nations was the first worldwide intergovernmental organization whose principal mission was to maintain world peace. white countries.
Unite nations security council has 15 members (representatives of 194,196 countries) unfair structure
UNSC unfair structure
Comments
Post a Comment